There should not be a left
or a right
Only a circle
where we sit close enough
to feel each other breathe
Politics learned the language of corners
sharp words
pointing fingers
maps drawn with rulers instead of hands
But the heart has no party
it votes every morning
for warmth
for safety
for the simple miracle of being seen
A border is just a sentence
written by fear
it says stop
it says yours not mine
it forgets the grammar of kindness
We are made of shared weather
shared grief
shared laughter spilling over pavements
like rain that refuses to choose a country
Imagine power that listens
laws that kneel to humanity
flags lowered just enough
to wrap the cold
Respect is not radical
Care is not naïve
They are ancient
older than slogans
older than walls
There should not be a left
or a right
only forward
together
hands open
voices softer
eyes brave enough to recognise themselves
in everyone else
A future where we do not win over each other
but with each other
where the loudest statement
is how gently
we choose to live
JH
Tag Archives: politics
No Right No Left
How Can You Sit and Be Silent?
How can you sit and be silent,
while children fade from the sky?
Do your lips not burn with the question
how long, how long, and why?
A man builds thrones from his lying tongue,
and truth is left to die.
Your silence is a shadow’s song
and even shadows cry.
JH
Alligator Alcatraz: The American Mirror We Refuse to Face
There’s a sickness crawling through the heart of America, and no, it’s not new. It’s ancient. It’s the rusted chain rattling through centuries of history. But now it’s not even trying to hide.
Racism has stepped out of the shadows, dusted off its boots, and made itself at home. No more dog whistles. No more veiled language. It’s on the surface, slick and shameless, sitting in the front seat of power. Fueled by wealth. Driven by hate. And guarded by laws that pretend to serve justice, but really serve only the rich and pale-skinned privileged.
This isn’t paranoia. It’s policy.
People of colour, immigrants, the undocumented, the unprivileged they’re not just living under threat. They’re living under siege. At the border, in the neighbourhoods, in the courtrooms, in the schools. Detained without cause. Separated from children. Torn from homes. And the world just watches as if this were a movie, distant and fictional. But it’s not. It’s here. It’s real. It’s Alligator Alcatraz, a cold-blooded, state-sanctioned prison of fear.
The land of the free? Only if you can afford it. Only if you look the part.
Where are the morals? They’ve been auctioned off. Sold to the highest bidder with a PAC fund and a private jet. The Constitution gets quoted like scripture, but only the verses that benefit the gatekeepers. The rest is redacted black lines over brown bodies.
And so we ask: Why isn’t the world more angry?
Maybe because anger is exhausting.
Maybe because some people still don’t believe it’s happening.
Or worse maybe they do believe it, and they just don’t care.
But we care. And caring means we can’t stay quiet.
This Alcatraz of inhumanity, this Alligator that snaps at the heels of justice, must be shut down. Not just the physical camps or detention centres, but the mindset that built them. The machinery that feeds on fear. The silence that protects it.
Justice is not a luxury. It’s a birthright.
And those who have stripped it from others must be held accountable. No immunity. No exception.
This isn’t just about America. It’s a mirror to the world.
So let the world be angry.
Let it rise.
Let it roar.
Because silence is complicity, and we’re done whispering.
The good vs bad perspective
The world has always been a place of duality—light and dark, good and evil, generosity and greed. This contrast exists in nature, human behaviour, and politics because balance often defines existence. In every society, there are those who act selflessly, striving for fairness and justice, while others manipulate systems for personal gain. Political ideologies reflect this divide, with some leaders seeking to uplift their people, while others exploit power for wealth and control. The struggle between good and bad is an inherent part of human nature, shaping the world in ways that ensure no singular force dominates completely.
In politics, this duality is especially evident. Some politicians work tirelessly for the well-being of their citizens, advocating for equality, social welfare, and economic stability. However, there are also those who prioritise personal ambition, using corruption, misinformation, and divisive tactics to maintain power. Greed plays a significant role in this, as those in positions of influence often put their interests above the needs of the public. This self-serving mindset can lead to policies that benefit the few while leaving the majority struggling. The pursuit of power and wealth can blind individuals to the suffering they cause, allowing greed to override morality.
People can be driven by an insatiable desire for more—more money, more power, more control—without considering the consequences of their actions. Greed strips individuals of empathy, making them prioritise their own gain at the expense of others. ( I could name a few!) This can be seen in corporate greed, where profit is placed above human welfare, and in politics, where leaders make decisions that benefit their interests rather than society. While there will always be those who fight for fairness and progress, the presence of greed ensures that the battle between good and bad will never truly end.
The Blame Game: How Dictators Deflect Responsibility and Target Minorities
In times of political and economic crisis, in which the USA is seeing a rise of hate and racism, history has shown a familiar pattern: authoritarian leaders refuse to take responsibility for their failures and instead shift the blame onto vulnerable groups. From the rise of fascism in the 20th century to modern-day autocracies, dictators have repeatedly used minorities as scapegoats, fuelling division and fear to maintain their grip on power. While we are all fighting with each other, they are busy doing their thing. Distraction is the key.
The Dictator’s Playbook: Shifting Blame
Dictators thrive on control, and when things go wrong—whether it’s economic downturns, political unrest, or military failures—they rarely admit fault. Instead, they create enemies. These enemies are often minority groups, marginalised communities, or social movements that challenge the status quo. By pointing fingers elsewhere, authoritarian leaders distract the public from their own incompetence and corruption.
A classic example is Nazi Germany, where Adolf Hitler blamed Jewish people for economic struggles and political instability, leading to catastrophic consequences. Similarly, in Stalinist Russia, Joseph Stalin purged ethnic groups, intellectuals, and political dissidents, branding them as “enemies of the state” to consolidate his own power. And now the USA has the petulant orange man who won’t take any criticism whatsoever, and you are fired on the spot if you are not a “yes” man.
Weaponizing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Rhetoric
In modern politics, movements that promote social justice—such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)have become convenient targets for authoritarian-minded leaders. Instead of addressing systemic inequalities, some politicians claim that DEI initiatives are to blame for economic problems, social divisions, or even declining national identity. By framing DEI as a threat rather than a means of creating fairer societies, autocrats can rally support from those who feel left behind or threatened by change. Can you see the pattern here?
For example, in Hungary, Viktor Orbán has openly attacked multiculturalism and LGBTQ+ rights, portraying them as dangerous Western ideologies undermining traditional values. Similarly, in the U.S., figures with authoritarian tendencies have targeted DEI efforts in education, business, and government, falsely suggesting that inclusion initiatives cause division rather than addressing pre-existing inequalities.
Why Dictators Target Minorities
- A Convenient Distraction – Blaming minorities for a nation’s problems diverts attention from government failures, corruption, or mismanagement.
- Creating an “Us vs. Them” Mentality – Dictators rely on fear to unite their base, convincing the majority that an “enemy” is responsible for societal decline.
- Destroying Opposition – Targeting activists, journalists, or minority leaders weakens resistance and silences dissenting voices.
- Maintaining Power – By controlling the narrative, dictators ensure loyalty and prevent citizens from questioning their rule. Look at North Korea, the population is terrified of uttering anything to anyone, for fear of prison or worse!
The Danger of Scapegoating
History warns us that once a leader begins blaming minority groups for national struggles, democracy is at risk. From the persecution of Jewish communities in the 1930s to modern anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, authoritarian regimes use division as a weapon. Today, when DEI efforts are framed as societal threats rather than progress, it serves as a red flag for growing authoritarianism. Blaming a group for just “being there” so they can commit genocide without any consequences!
Nigel Farage has long relied on anti-immigrant rhetoric to stoke fear and division, blaming migrants for issues that have little to do with them. Whether it’s the struggling NHS, housing shortages, or crime rates, Farage repeatedly points the finger at immigration rather than addressing deeper systemic problems like underfunding, government mismanagement, and economic inequality. His claims often lack evidence but serve a political purpose—distracting from real policy failures while inflaming public resentment. By portraying migrants as the root of the UK’s challenges, Farage perpetuates a misleading narrative that ignores the contributions immigrants make to society and diverts attention from those truly responsible for the nation’s problems.
Resisting the Blame Game
To counter this tactic, societies must:
- Educate Against Misinformation – Understanding historical patterns of scapegoating helps prevent their repetition. This is a vital tactic.
- Defend DEI and Human Rights – Advocating for fairness and inclusion is essential in resisting divisive rhetoric.
- Hold Leaders Accountable – Governments must be scrutinised for their policies and failures rather than accepting convenient scapegoats. Money should not be why a political party is in power forever!
A dictator will always find someone to blame, but history has shown that societies that resist fear-mongering and advocate inclusion endure.
Art by Julan
Understanding Transgender Identity Among Youth: A Call for Respect and Understanding
In recent years, society has witnessed an increase in young people identifying as transgender, meaning their gender identity does not align with the sex they were assigned at birth. This phenomenon has sparked extensive discussions, with varying opinions on its causes, prevalence, and implications. It is crucial to approach this topic with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to respecting the lived experiences of transgender youth.
Why Some Young People Identify as Transgender
The reasons behind a young person identifying as transgender are complex and multifaceted. Gender identity is influenced by a combination of biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors. For some youth, identifying as transgender is an innate realization of their true selves, while for others, the journey involves exploring and questioning their identity over time.
- Biological and Psychological Factors: Research suggests that gender identity is rooted in the brain’s development and may not align with physical anatomy. Some studies point to differences in brain structure and function in transgender individuals, supporting the idea that gender identity is not merely a choice but a deeply ingrained aspect of one’s being.
- Social and Cultural Influences: Increased visibility and representation of transgender individuals in media and society have helped normalise discussions about gender diversity. This representation provides a sense of validation and possibility for young people who may feel different but lacked the language or role models to articulate their feelings in the past. We certainly do not need high-profile people bullying such groups because of their lack of knowledge or understanding. Or simply saying, “There are only boys or girls at birth”, or “Trans kids do not exist” is a damaging and uneducated statement. Which is bolstered on ignorance or an uncaring attitude towards the young.
- Emotional Well-being: For many young people, identifying as transgender is a crucial step in achieving emotional and mental well-being. Living in alignment with one’s true gender identity can alleviate feelings of dysphoria, depression, and anxiety. I have met many wonderful “trans” students. Who am I to tell them they are not who they feel they are?
- Peer and Community Support: Youth are more likely to explore and express their identities in environments where acceptance and support are present. The rise of online communities has given young people spaces to connect with others who share similar experiences. As an author and a visitor to many student places, understanding is essential. I have met many young people who are worried about what others think. I have always had to reassure them that it’s “Ok to be you”. As an author, it’s my duty to be respectful of everyone, not flounce around like it’s my duty to bully anyone.
How Common Is This?
Estimating the prevalence of transgender youth is challenging due to underreporting and varying definitions of gender diversity. However, recent studies suggest that about 1.4% of U.S. teens identify as transgender, with similar patterns observed globally. This number may continue to rise as societal acceptance grows and more young people feel safe to express themselves.
A quote from the 2021 census. UK
- he census question on gender identity was a voluntary question asked of those aged 16 years and over. The question asked “Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?”.
- Overall, 45.7 million (94.0% of the population aged 16 years and over) answered the question.
- In total, 45.4 million (93.5%) answered “Yes” and 262,000 (0.5%) answered “No”.
- The remaining 2.9 million (6.0%) did not answer the question
It is important to recognise that being transgender is not a trend or phase but a legitimate aspect of human diversity. The increase in visibility reflects greater societal acceptance and understanding rather than an increase in the occurrence of transgender identities.
The Importance of Respect and Support
Respecting the identities of transgender youth is a fundamental aspect of fostering inclusivity and reducing harm. Misunderstanding, discrimination, and lack of acceptance can have devastating effects on a young person’s mental health and overall well-being. Studies show that transgender youth are at a higher risk of experiencing bullying, mental health challenges, and even suicide due to societal stigma.
- Affirmation: Using a young person’s chosen name and pronouns significantly improves their mental health and fosters a sense of belonging.
- Education: Increasing awareness about gender diversity among families, schools, and communities can create supportive environments where all young people feel valued.
- Advocacy: Policies and practices that protect the rights of transgender individuals, such as anti-discrimination laws and access to gender-affirming healthcare, are essential for their well-being.
In the end…
The rising number of young people identifying as transgender reflects a broader societal shift toward understanding and accepting gender diversity. While the reasons for this are complex, the solution is simple: respect and support. By fostering empathy and creating inclusive environments, society can empower transgender youth to thrive and live authentically. Respecting their identities is not only a matter of kindness but also a recognition of their fundamental human rights. So think before you talk or type!
JH
The Catastrophic Consequences of Overturning Roe v. Wade: Women’s Autonomy Matters
Let’s get started, shall we… On this rather “dystopianesk” subject…
The landmark Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, in 1973 recognised a woman’s constitutional right to access safe and legal abortion. For almost five decades, this ruling has been a crucial safeguard for women’s reproductive rights, allowing them to make decisions about their bodies and futures. However, the ongoing efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade pose a significant threat to women’s autonomy and well-being. In this blog post, we will discuss the catastrophic consequences that would arise from overturning this decision, emphasising the importance of women having the right to choose what happens to their bodies.
Loss of Reproductive Autonomy:
Overturning Roe v. Wade would signify a blatant disregard for women’s autonomy. The decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy is deeply personal and should be left to the individual who will be directly affected by it. Women should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and be able to access safe and legal abortion if they choose to do so. By taking away this right, women are denied control over their reproductive lives, forcing them to carry pregnancies against their will.
Unsafe Abortions and Health Risks:
History has shown that when abortion is restricted or criminalised, women’s health and lives are put at risk. Before Roe v. Wade, many women resorted to unsafe and illegal methods to terminate unwanted pregnancies, often leading to severe complications, injuries, and even death. If access to safe and legal abortion becomes limited, it will force women to seek alternative and dangerous methods, once again putting their lives on the line. Denying women access to safe healthcare options is a grave injustice that should not be tolerated.
Disproportionate Impact on Marginalised Communities:
Overturning Roe v. Wade would disproportionately affect marginalised communities, exacerbating existing inequalities. Women from low-income backgrounds, women of colour, and those living in rural areas already face significant barriers when it comes to accessing healthcare services. Restrictions on abortion would further compound these challenges, leaving these vulnerable populations with fewer options and limited resources. It is essential to recognise that reproductive rights are intertwined with social justice and equality.
Economic Consequences:
The ability to make decisions about reproductive health plays a vital role in women’s economic well-being. When women are free to choose if and when to have children, they can pursue education, careers, and economic stability. Overturning Roe v. Wade would hinder women’s economic advancement, as they would be forced into motherhood without the means or desire to provide for a child. This not only affects women’s financial independence but also perpetuates cycles of poverty.
Legal Precedent and Women’s Rights:
Roe v. Wade is not just about abortion; it represents a more significant principle: the recognition of women’s rights and bodily autonomy. Overturning this landmark decision would set a dangerous precedent, opening the door to further restrictions on women’s reproductive rights and undermining the progress made in the fight for gender equality. It is crucial to protect the gains achieved and continue working towards a society that respects and upholds women’s rights.
And the end?
The potential consequences of overturning Roe v. Wade are far-reaching and devastating for women across the United States. Denying women the right to make decisions about their own bodies is an infringement on their autonomy, health, and overall well-being. It is essential to champion women’s reproductive rights, ensuring access to safe and legal abortion as a fundamental aspect of healthcare. Let us strive for a society that values and empowers women rather than subjecting them to the decisions of a few misogynistic individuals. Leave our bodies alone!
Julan62 